Quản lý thuật ngữ quân sự Anh-Việt trong tài liệu quốc phòng & gìn giữ hòa bình

VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES MILITARY TERMINOLOGY USED IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE MILITARY DOCUMENTS — FROM BILINGUAL TERMINOLOGY MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE (Thuật ngữ quan sự trong các tài liệu quân sw bằng tiếng Anh va tiếng Việt - nhìn từ góc độ quản lý thuật ngữ song ngữ) MAJOR: ENGLISH LINGUISTICS CODE: 9220201. Lê Hùng Tiến Hanoi, 2024 VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES MILITARY TERMINOLOGY USED IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE MILITARY DOCUMENTS - FROM BILINGUAL TERMINOLOGY MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE (Thuật ngữ quan sự trong các tài liệu quân sw bằng tiếng Anh va tiếng Việt - nhìn từ góc độ quản lý thuật ngữ song ngữ) MAJOR: ENGLISH LINGUISTICS CODE: 9220201. Lê Hùng Tiến Hanoi, 2024 Công trình được hoàn thành tại: Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội Người hướng dẫn khoa học: PGS. TS Lê Hùng Tiến Phản biện 1: PGS.

TS Tran Thị Ngọc Yến Phản biên 2: PGS. TS Hoàng Tuyết Minh Phản biện 3: PGS. TS Nguyễn Quang Ngoạn Luận án được bảo vệ trước Hội đồng cấp nhà nước chấm luận án tiễn sĩ họp tại Đại học Ngoại ngữ, ĐHQGHN vào hồi giờ 08.30 ngày 19 tháng 04 năm 2024 Có thê tìm hiệu luận án tại: - Thu viện Quốc gia Việt Nam ; - Trung tâm Thông tin — Thư viện, Dai hoc Quoc gia Ha Nội STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP I, the undersigned, hereby confirm that the thesis entitled “Military terminology used in English and Vietnamese military documents — From bilingual terminology management perspective” is my own work. To the best of my knowledge, the thesis contains no work previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made.

Signature Hoang Anh Nguyén ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The successful completion of this Doctoral Thesis is attributed to the invaluable knowledge, guidance, and support received from numerous individuals and institutions. Without their contributions, the author would not have attained this significant accomplishment. First and foremost, my deepest gratitude is to my knowledgeable and experienced supervisor, Assoc. Lê Hùng Tiến, who were strict but always encouraging to enthusiastically lead me along the hard journey to the final destination.

I also would like to express my gratitude to Prof. Nguyén Hoa, Prof. Nguyén Quang, Dr. Huỳnh Anh Tuấn as well as other lecturers and professors at the University of Foreign Languages and International Studies - Vietnam National University, Hanoi for their lectures on research methodology and linguistic theories, which provide the theoretical and methodological background for my thesis.

I am very much grateful to Assoc. Phan Van Hoa, Assoc. Tran Ba Tién, Dr. Lé Thi Giao Chi, Dr.

Truong Bach Lé, and Dr. Pham Thi Thuy who gave me insightful comments and invaluable ideas to develop my research from the beginning of my academic journey. My sincere thanks go to all commanders of Military Science Academy; Colonel, Assoc. Prof Nguyen Thu Hanh — Dean of the English Department and my dear colleagues and students for their continuous support and encouragement throughout this challenging journey.

My in-depth appreciation is also due to all my senior PhD students for their care and inspiration, which are forever a part of the study. I would also like to express my gratitude to all my helpful friends, colleagues, comrades, especially those at Military Science Academy and Vietnam Department of Peacekeeping Operations, whose urgent needs and feedbacks for term support motivated me to embark on investigating peacekeeping terminology. In conclusion, I express heartfelt appreciation to my patient, tolerant, and generous family members including my parents, brothers and sisters, my beloved wife and sons, whose sacrifices for my Doctoral Degree achievement and unwavering support lifted my spirits when hope waned, transforming my dream into a tangible reality. Hoang Anh Nguyén ABSTRACT This doctoral thesis explores the crucial role of managing military terminology, with a special focus on peacekeeping terms, amidst the Vietnam People’s Army's deeper integration into the global military landscape, including United Nations peacekeeping missions.

The objective is to streamline access to an extensive array of linguistic and conceptual knowledge through the creation of a bilingual terminological knowledge base. This base organizes military peacekeeping terminology alphabetically and categorizes each concept within a framework of hierarchical conceptual categories and a semantic network. Employing Frame-based Terminology, as proposed by Faber in 2012, the research delves into semantic relationships and conceptual categories to construct knowledge structures related to various events. The methodology encompasses semantic and corpus analysis, thematic analysis, and both focus group interviews and surveys to gather comprehensive insights.

The study unveils 22 primary relationships within the military peacekeeping realm, covering a spectrum from functions and attributes to methods and phases. Additionally, it categorizes peacekeeping terminology into five principal groups: ENTITY, ACTION, SITUATION, MEASUREMENT, and ATTRIBUTE. The analysis further leads to the development of five distinct knowledge structures around key terms and events like EVACUATION and SEARCH AND RESCUE, thereby enriching the linguistic and military knowledge base for peacekeepers. These findings underscore the enriched linguistic and conceptual resources now available to peacekeepers, enhancing their operational capabilities.

The research not only advocates for further exploration within other military domains but also underscores the importance of similar studies in military healthcare, intelligence, engineering, and communication sectors, among others. TABLE OF CONTENTS pages STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP. i TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS. Vili CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 1.

Statement of the problem. ccc ccc cece nce e cece ne ene eee eee eenae tees 1 1. The significance of military terminology SuppOFf. Terminology management research øap.

Research aim and ObJ€CfIV€S. Research qU€SfIONS.c cence eens ena tense nh kg 7 4. Scope of the SfUỦY. cece nee ce HS nh Hết 8 5.

Methods of the Study. ccc cece cee c cece eee eee e ene ene nh tent eee eens 9 6. Significance of the StUdy.- e cence ee ng 10 7. Structure of the th€S1S.---- c2 2n nh nh nh.

10 CHAPTER TWO: LITERA TURE REVIEW 12 2.--- c2 nh nh nh nh se 12 2. Overview of terminolOøØy. General terminology theOry. Communicative terminology theory.

Cognitive-based terminology theorIes. Frame-based Terminology as a primary theoretical foundation for the study 22 2. Frames and specialized language. Domain in Frame-based Terminology.

Theoretical premises of Frame-based Terminology.-- cece eee e eee tees rên 56 2. Definition of key ferms. Conceptual cafegØOT1ZafIO'. Translation and specialized language translafion.

Translation DFOC€SS. Specialized language communIcafion. Specialized communication process componenfs. Translators as text senderS/TeC€IV€TS.

Translators as terminologISfS. The specialized t€Xf. eee e eee eee etna eee nh ke 70 2. Translation of specialized texts.

The need of a terminological knowledge structure. Previous related stud1es. Summary of Chapter TWO.--c che 82 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 83 3. eee e nets eee SH nh nh khen 83 3.

Interpretation of the methodology to research questions. c2 nh nh nhện 88 3. cce cece cece e nce e ene HT TT etna nh nh nh kg 88 3. The dICfIO'IATI€S.-- n cece eee ae SH 89 3.

The DOD Dictionarles. HH HS HH Km nh ng 91 3. The Peacekeeping Corpus. Focus group ITIf€TVICW.

nh nh hệt 3. SH nh ve 3. Focus group interview đeSIØn. Planning and conducting the focus group In(erVIew.c nee eens 2n nhu 3.cQQQ eee ene eee ng kh kh hy 3.

cece eee ce eee e cence nee eneee eee eaeneeeenenseneenene eae 3. Data analysis procedure.‹cc cà cnet eae ees 3. Analysis of Corpus Concordances. Analysis of Term Definitions.

Analytical framework of the sfudy. eee e eee e cence nee eeeeenee tee tneeneeneas 3. ng ng ng ng ng TK ke kg ki ke nề kh 3.--c cọ HS HH HH nh kh kh 3.---- SH nh nh re 3.---ccccnn ng ene kg kh khấu 3. Summary of Chapter TÌhree.------------- << <<: CHAPTER FOUR: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.

Fundamental semantic relations of English military peacekeeping terms. nee eee ng nh nh nhà ees 4. Has_function reÌatIOn. 2n nh kh rà 4.

Attribute_of telatiOn.c ence ng vn xa 4. Consists_of relation. c cece ccc nce ence een n ng ra SA N20) 2Nilẻrởšađiiadiidididditiẳiẳ. Effected_by reÌatION.

ng nà hy 4.cc c nn SH SH en kiên 4. Takes_place_in T€ÏatÏON. SH nh nh nh nh nh kg 132 4. By_rmeans_ oƒreÏatIOn.

Takes_place_before/during/after relatlon. Conducted_by reÏatIOn. Located_at relation. cece cece ccc cc cece cece cece eee eeeneeeeeues 136 4.

Result_of reÌÏatIOn. HH nh aeas 137 4. Cawuses Co) <1 6 (0) | n2 HE nh và 138 4. For_reason_ oƒTeÌÏafIOn.

nh nh kh khu 138 4.0 ccc cece cece eee eee eee eect kh kh enna eats 139 4. Subordinate_to reÌatIOn. Coordinates rela[On.c e nee ene nh kh nh 140 4. Phase_ oƒTeÌatIOn.c SH nh nh eae 141 4.

Delimited_ by reÌatlOn. eee eee ence ene nh xo 142 4. Method_oƒreÌatOn. nh nh e ene e nas 142 4.

Conceptual categorization of English military peacekeeping terms. Building bilingual peacekeeping knowledge structures based on 154 semantic relations and conceptual cateøorIzaftion. Filling in conceptual øaps. Bilingual knowledge structures constructed.

Vietnamese translational equivalents of English military 156 peacekeeping f€Tms.-- c2 eee nh hà kg 4. Perception of experts of the findings. Findings from the focus group 1nf€rVI€W. Findings from the survey questionnaIre.

Summary of Chapter FOUT.----------c<<s<<s+ 177 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION 178 5. Recapitulation of the study. Fundamental semantic relations of English military peacekeeping terminology. Conceptual categories of English military peacekeeping terminology.

Bilingual knowledge structure of peacekeeping events. Contributions of the StUdy. Implications of the study. Implications for theOTY.

Implications for research. Implications for pFaCtIC€. Limitations and suggestions for further research. nh nen 187 APPENDIX I.QQQnnnn HH nh nhe 1 APPENDIX IH.

ch ili APPENDIX IID.0 cc cece nee e eee ene ee ene ee eneeeeneneeneenenes viii APPENDIX IV. e nee ne tet nh kh nh kh Xxi viii TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviations Standing for AAP-06 NATO glossary of terms and definitions (English and French) DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms CTT Communicative Terminology Theory FBT Frame-based Terminology GTT General Terminology Theory LGM Lexical Grammar Model LR Lexical Relations LS Logical Structure MINUSMA The United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali MONUSCO The United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo RRG Role and Reference Grammar STT Sociocognitive Terminology Theory SoA State of affairs VNDPO Vietnam Department of Peacekeeping Operations UK United Kingdoms UN United Nations UNMISS The United Nations Mission in South Sudan UNMOGIP The United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan US United States WIPO The World Intellectual Property Organization ix LIST OE TABLES Table Title Page Table 2.1 | Lexical domains in the verbal lexicon (Faber and Mairal 1999, p.2 | Description of Aktionsart types in RRG (Mairal and Cortés 38 2006, p.3 | Basis RRG logical structures 40 Table 2.4 | Semantic relations (Faber 2012) 57 Table 2.5 | Military operation definitional hierarchy 62 Table 2.6 | Definitional template of MILITARY OPERATION 63 Table 2.7 | Definitional template of AMPHIBIOUS OPERATION 63 Table 2.8 | Definitional template of AMPHIBIOUS WITHDRAWAL 63 Table 2.9 | Knowledge patterns and their conceptual relations (León and | 79 Reimerink 2010, p.1 | The mixed method nature of the study 87 Table 3.2 | Essential elements of the methodology 88 Table 3.3 | Five entries from the original glossary 89 Table 3.4 | Examples of official UN reports and documents 95 Table 3.5 | Description of focus group participants 100 Table 3.6 | Definitions of EXERCISE from the DoD and the APP-06 108 Table 3.7 | Conceptual relations extracted from the definitions of EXERCISE 108 Table 3.8 | Definitional template of CONFLICT PREVENTION 111 Table 4.1 | Inventory of semantic relations of peacekeeping terms 120 Table 4. | Number of semantic relations from definitional analysis 121 Table 4. | Number of semantic relations from corpus analysis 122 Table 4.4 | Semantic relations in order of popularity 123 Table 4.5 | Definitional analysis of MINE 125 Table 4.6 | Definitional analysis of CONFLICT PREVENTION 126 Table 4.7 | Definitional analysis of PEACE ENFORCEMENT 127 Table 4.