Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện và Đại học - Luận án Tiến sĩ Luke Rohan Tucker
Luận án: Tucker lr thesis. Xem tóm tắt và tải về tại LuanAn.net
The University of Sydney
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
Luan An
Luận án tiến sĩ
Năm xuất bản
Số trang
349
Thời gian đọc
53 phút
Lượt xem
0
Lượt tải
0
Phí lưu trữ
60 Point
Tổng quan nhanh
- Chủ đề:
- Devotio Moderna & University Culture: Academic Thesis Insight
- Số trang:
- 349 trang
- Trường:
- The University of Sydney
- Chuyên ngành:
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
- Tác giả:
- Luke Rohan Tucker
- Năm:
- 2021
Tóm tắt nội dung luận án
I.Devotio Moderna University Culture Academic Thesis Insight
The Devotio Moderna movement emerged from foundational conflicts. Its origins included explicit rejections of established scholastic and university culture. Early narratives describe book burnings, symbolizing this deep opposition. Understanding the movement requires acknowledging these initial confrontations. Prior scholarship often overlooked this central tension, misinterpreting the Devotio Moderna's true nature. This academic thesis re-examines these historical narratives. It offers a new perspective on the movement's core identity.
1.1. Examining Foundational Conflicts
The Devotio Moderna’s genesis involved a significant clash with existing academic structures. Scholastic traditions were directly challenged. University culture faced explicit rejections. This foundational antagonism shaped the movement from its earliest days. Its very essence involved a confrontation with the prevailing intellectual and educational institutions. This thesis argues these confrontations were central, not peripheral.
1.2. Challenging Prior Interpretations
Past analyses frequently missed this crucial dynamic. Scholars often separated the movement's pastoral care from its teaching. These aspects were presented as exclusive alternatives. Other studies minimized the New Devout’s role as a distinct culture of learning. Such approaches proved inadequate. They misread the Devotio Moderna’s complex relationship with its academic environment. A revised understanding is presented here.
II.Rethinking Devotio Moderna Research Methodology History
Rethinking the Devotio Moderna requires a robust research methodology. This academic study employs Charles Taylor’s framework of the Social Imaginary. This theoretical lens allows for a deeper understanding of cultural shifts. It moves beyond previous limited interpretations. The thesis proposes the Devotio Moderna evolved from a distinct Augustinian Imaginary. This conceptual framework is crucial for its historical analysis.
2.1. Adopting a Social Imaginary Framework
Charles Taylor’s Social Imaginary framework provides the analytical toolset. This methodology enables exploration of collective understandings and practices. It illuminates how societies perceive their existence. Applying this framework reveals underlying cultural dynamics. It clarifies the intellectual landscape within which the Devotio Moderna operated. This approach offers a novel perspective on historical development.
2.2. Uncovering the Augustinian Influence
The Devotio Moderna’s core developed from an Augustinian Imaginary. This sense originated from Saint Augustine and his medieval successors. Their ideas provided a foundational worldview for the movement. This Augustinian perspective deeply informed the New Devout’s identity. It shaped their values, practices, and intellectual orientation. Understanding this influence is key to grasping the movement’s motivations.
III.Augustinian Imaginary Foundations of Graduate Research
The Augustinian Imaginary formed a critical foundation for the Devotio Moderna, impacting its graduate research context. This worldview was sustained through centuries by cathedral schools and monastic education. By the Observant Century, this Augustinian framework faced a formidable rival. The universitas emerged as a powerful, competing Social Imaginary. The New Devout found this new paradigm irreconcilable with their core beliefs. This incompatibility led to their outright rejection of the universitas.
3.1. Competition with the Universitas
The universitas represented a distinct and opposing Social Imaginary. This new cultural paradigm contrasted sharply with the Augustinian worldview. For the New Devout, reconciliation proved impossible. This fundamental difference fueled their rejection of university culture. The universitas embodied an intellectual framework divergent from their own. This competition shaped the Devotio Moderna's historical trajectory.
3.2. Daily Habits and Internalized Conflict
The conflict between these imaginaries deeply influenced the movement's daily life. The Devotio Moderna’s practices of reading, writing, and prayer became sites of this tension. These habits reflected an internal struggle with external scholastic norms. The imagined conflict with scholastic university culture permeated their existence. It was a significant element within the movement's collective imagination.
IV.Conflict Historical Analysis Dissertation Significance
This dissertation offers a significant contribution to historical analysis. It repositions the central issues surrounding the Devotio Moderna. The study highlights the movement's fundamental relationship with scholastic and university culture. Previous analyses often missed this integral connection. Understanding this conflict is crucial for comprehending the Devotio Moderna's place in history. The research deepens insight into a complex historical period.
4.1. Repositioning Key Analytical Issues
The thesis redefines the analytical landscape for Devotio Moderna studies. It shifts focus to the core conflict with university culture. This reframing clarifies the movement's motivations and trajectory. It moves beyond superficial interpretations. The study establishes the inherent antagonism as a primary lens for understanding. This repositioning is a major contribution to the field.
4.2. Historian s Institutional Dilemma
The research also illuminates a challenge for the contemporary historian. Historians often operate within institutions that are descendants of the very universitas the New Devout opposed. This creates a unique analytical difficulty. The universitas ultimately supplanted the Devotio Moderna. This institutional context influences the interpretation of historical movements. Acknowledging this dilemma is vital for objective historical analysis.
V.Historian s Challenge Graduate Research Culture Shifts
The historian faces a unique challenge when conducting graduate research on cultural shifts. Understanding movements animated by an opposing imaginary proves difficult. The modern discipline of history is a distant descendant of the universitas. This institution was precisely what the Devotio Moderna opposed. This thesis articulates this inherent interpretive hurdle. It underscores the complexity of historical understanding across deeply divergent cultural frameworks.
5.1. Understanding Opposing Imaginaries
Grasping a historical movement's core requires understanding its animating imaginary. The Devotio Moderna operated from a worldview directly opposed to the universitas. This foundational difference creates an interpretive chasm. The modern academic framework, stemming from the universitas, struggles to fully comprehend this opposition. This research highlights the need for empathy towards historically divergent thought.
5.2. Modern History s Interpretive Limits
The discipline of history, as it exists today, is vivified by the universitas imaginary. This inherent bias can limit its ability to interpret movements like the Devotio Moderna. Such movements rejected the very cultural framework that underpins modern academia. The thesis explores these interpretive limits. It encourages a critical self-reflection within the historical discipline itself.
Tải xuống file đầy đủ để xem toàn bộ nội dung
Tải đầy đủ (349 trang)Trích đoạn nội dung luận án
Tải xuống để đọc toàn bộName: Luke Rohan Tucker Title: Devotio Moderna: Confrontations with Scholastic, University Culture Faculty: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Institution: The University of Sydney Year of Award: 2021 A thesis submitted to fulfil requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ABSTRACT The founding stories of the Devotio Moderna began with a book burning and explicit rejections of scholastic, university culture. Most scholars have either pitted the movement’s dimensions of pastoral care and teaching against each other as exclusive alternatives or have declined to treat the New Devout’s status as a culture of learning. However, if we are to take this mythos as essential to the movement, we must proceed from the outset that confrontations with scholastic, university culture lay at the heart of the Devotio Moderna.
This thesis suggests that either above approach is inadequate and misreads the movement. Using Charles Taylor’s framework of the Social Imaginary, this thesis argues that the Devotio Moderna developed based on an Augustinian Imaginary, a sense deriving from Augustine and his medieval interlocutors. By the time of the Observant Century, this Augustinian Imaginary, long since sustained by cathedral schools and monastic education, now stood in competition with the universitas, a competing Social Imaginary that the New Devout could not reconcile with their Augustinian Imaginary and therefore rejected. By articulating the Devotio Moderna’s daily habits of reading, writing, and prayer, this thesis argues that this site of conflict between the Devotio Moderna and scholastic, university culture loomed large in the movement’s imagination.
By relocating the key issues at stake in analysis of the Devotio Moderna, we also see the difficulty of the historian writing within the institution that the New Devout opposed, but which ultimately supplanted the movement. This thesis is therefore significant as a repositioning of analysis of the Devotio Moderna as a movement in relation fundamentally to scholastic, university culture, and in being an articulation of the difficulty for the universitas’ distant descendant, the modern discipline of history, to understand a historical movement animated by an imaginary opposed to that which vivified, and continues to vivify, university culture. 2 This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes.
I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources has been acknowledged. Luke Tucker 3 Devotio Moderna Confrontations with Scholastic, University Culture 4 Augustinus: Ecce oravi Deum Ratio: Quid ergo scire vis? A.: Haec ipsa omnia quae oravi.: Breviter ea collige.: Deum et animam scire cupio.7 5 Acknowledgments I want to thank first my supervisor Dr. John Gagné for his counsel, equanimity, and support over the course of writing this dissertation. John, thank you for your delightful mix of curiosity, gentleness, and erudition.
Couldn’t have done it without you. Besides my supervisor I would also like to thank Assoc. Nick Eckstein, Dr. Hélène Sirantoine, Prof.
Stephen Gaukroger, Dr. James Christie and Dr. Julie Ann Smith for their critique, support, and provoking discussion. Sydney University’s Medieval and Early Modern Centre (MEMC) also proved a valuable forum for testing out hunches and benefitting from pointed, clarifying conversation.
I am grateful for the opportunity to present a small part of this thesis in 2018 at the annual conference of the Society for Renaissance Studies. In the course of researching and information gathering I am thankful for the various archives who provided orientation and access to material for my work. In particular, I want to thank the Stadsarchief en Athenaeumbibliotheek Deventer, the Universiteit van Amsterdam, the Streeksarchief Midden-Holland in Gouda, and Bibliothèque du Séminaire Episcopal de Liège. This dissertation has ended up treading over several language barriers.
I am grateful for the Germanic Studies department at Sydney university and my kind and generous teachers Silke, Tristan, Phillipp, and Sabina for allowing me to take part in their courses as Gasthörer. Additionally, the German for Humanities reading group run by the late Brian Taylor was an unexpected joy and invaluable help. I wish Brian were still around to hear me say so. Various people have provided informal help in reading, critiquing, and editing my work.
I want to thank my mother Cathy Tucker, my wife Em, Matthew Payne, and Dr. Rory Shiner, who first encouraged me to consider seriously postgraduate study. Thanks guys! I doubt that would have survived the ordeal of writing a dissertation without the support, fellowship, and prayers of Matthew Moffit and the community of Christian scholars of EPS. Matt, it made all the difference that you didn’t ask me to justify my choice of period (the Dark Ages!) and that you regularly offered a gentle, reflective presence through the ups and downs of 6 postgraduate life.
Sam, thanks for all the Thai food and fellowship we shared together. Your support, empathy, and understanding got me through many difficult seasons of research and writing. Finally, I want to thank my wife Em. Em, thank you for your patience and forbearance as I stressed, pondered, and thought out loud over these last four years.
I would never have secured funding, navigated confusing paperwork, or correctly filled in online forms without your help and administrative wizardry. I don’t think just any wife would be so excited about the lifestyle that comes along with writing a dissertation, but you never complained about the costs that came with this project and were quick to affirm its value. Your encouragement and belief in the value and beauty of what I was doing sustained me over long periods of difficult, trying work. You helped me stop and rest when research began to creep into parts of my life it shouldn’t have, but were patient when I just had to dive into a book or knock out a bit more language work.
Your patient witness of faith kept me from losing heart and reminded me time and again where true wisdom is found. We made it! Soli Deo gloria. 7 A Note on Translations I am grateful for the help of my supervisor, Dr. John Gagné, in aiding me with accurate translations of French material.
Unless otherwise indicated all other translations are my own. 8 CONTENTS 1 Confrontations with Scholastic, University Culture. 10 2 Literature Review, Aims, and Objectives, Method. 64 4 New Options: Universitas.
97 5 Exhortations to Reading. 132 6 Time, Reading, and Rhythms of Life. 183 7 Book-copying and Book-production. 218 8 Pastoral Care and Teaching.
245 9 Erasmus and the Universitas. 316 11 Epilogue: Writing within the University. 331 9 1 CONFRONTATIONS WITH SCHOLASTIC, UNIVERSITY CULTURE The Devotio Moderna began with a book burning. In 1372, close to death, Geert Grote († 1384) agreed at the request of his priest to have his books of medicine and astrology burnt in order to receive what he thought was his last Eucharist.
Educated at the University of Paris for over a decade, Grote treasured these sources of knowledge and he did not give them up to the fire easily. Having first sent the priest away, Grote had a change of heart. As he looked back later, this was the beginning of his lifelong conversio, his turning towards God. Faced with the choice between his precious knowledge and receiving the body of Christ in preparation for death, Grote chose the latter.
Though Geert Grote did not in fact die, this near-death experience proved portentous. After his recovery, Grote was a changed man. Previously the libertine intellectual preparing to enter a lucrative clerical career, Grote forsook his possessions, his inheritance rights, and his status to embark on a tour of preaching around the Netherlands. His vision was to recapture the intense, lived-out piety of the ecclesia primitiva, a life characterized by humility, poverty, and the imitation of Christ.
This life he modelled became known to contemporaries by the moniker Devotio Moderna – the New Devout – a recapitulation of the manner of living of the early Christians.1 Grote’s newfound task was to bring this modern-day devotion of lived-out apostolic piety to a hard-hearted people in the Netherlands. 2 (Despite multiple options existing to translate Devotio Moderna, I have chosen to refer to the movement as the New Devout or simply by the Latin. This, I believe, captures the right sense of energy of a new movement of devotion and piety, while also reminding the reader by the original Latin that this movement entailed a reaching back to the past and not novel invention.) After his premature death in 1384 amidst one of the many waves of disease and pestilence that swamped his hometown of Deventer, a small band of his disciples began to meet in his house. van Engen, Sisters and Brothers of the Common Life: The Devotio Moderna and the World of the Later Middle Ages (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014), 7.
van Engen, ‘New Devotion in the Low Countries’, Ons Geestelijk Erf 77, no. 3 Susanne Krauss, Die Devotio Moderna in Deventer: Anatomie eines Zentrums der Reformbewegung, (Berlin; Münster: Lit, 2007). 10 These followers spread quickly beyond Grote’s own house in Deventer throughout the Low Countries.4 This geographic region, the Low Countries, did not form a coherent political entity, nor was it unified by cultural practice or common vernacular. The patchwork of littoral and overland trade networks fell first under Burgundian power and, after its collapse in 1477, the Habsburg Empire.
One encounters Frisian dialects in the North; Dutch and Low German in the Netherlands, Westphalia, and the Rhineland; and French dialects in the South. Latin and its attendant ecclesiastical culture thus formed one of the few common threads running through the Low Countries in the long fifteenth century. The New Devout straddled these two worlds, the unified bloc of Latin culture and the patchwork of vernacular culture, as they established communities through the Low Countries. Three main works produced within the milieu of the New Devout have led to a view that the Devotio Moderna was primarily a Dutch movement.
These texts were written in Zwolle, Deventer, and Windesheim in the mid- and late-fifteenth century. Thomas à Kempis, an Augustinian monk at Agnietenberg (near Zwolle) personally familiar with Grote’s disciples wrote in his Dialogus noviciorum in the 1430s a history of the brothers aimed primarily at winning youths to their way of life. Thirty or so years later in 1458 Rudolph Dier Muden wrote a necrology of the brothers of the Windesheim congregation. This history, more historical than Thomas’, was supplemented by another brother of the house, Petrus Hoorn († 1479).
Roughly contemporary to this chronicle, Johann Busch († c.1480) documented the expansion of the New Devout in two separate works: Liber de origine devotionis modernae and Liber de viris illustribus. Many other brother- and sister-houses produced Vitae and chronicles of their houses, but the majority of such accounts were composed from within the diocese of Utrecht. Recently, however, scholars have pointed to the competing regional accounts and suggested that the genesis of the Devotio Moderna amounts less to an emanation from a single rough point – Deventer and Utrecht – and more a gradual conglomeration of multiple movements of observant reform. John van Engen has, in this way, shown how some the Brabantine New Devout saw themselves as stretching back to Jan van 4 Miri Rubin and Walter Simons, eds., Christianity in Western Europe c.
11 Ruusbroec at Groenendaal to identify the origins of his house.5 While this need not discount the centrality of Grote and his disciples for the formation of the Devotio Moderna, this early stage of the Devotio Moderna within the diocese of Utrecht being a key focus on this thesis, it must be remembered that its spread was more complex than an emanation from a single rough point. The Devotio Moderna spread from the area of modern-day Overijssel through the Netherlands, northern parts of Belgium and western parts of Germany.
Nội dung được bảo vệ bản quyền — Tải xuống đầy đủ
Trích dẫn luận án này
Luke Rohan Tucker (2021). Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện [Luận án tiến sĩ, The University of Sydney]. LuanAn.net. https://luanan.net/ly-luan-va-lich-su-giao-duc/triet-hoc-giao-duc/tucker-lr-thesis
Câu hỏi thường gặp
Luận án "Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện" nghiên cứu về vấn đề gì?
Luận án: Tucker lr thesis. Xem tóm tắt và tải về tại LuanAn.net
Luận án "Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện" được bảo vệ tại trường nào?
Luận án này được bảo vệ tại The University of Sydney. Năm bảo vệ: 2021.
Luận án "Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện" thuộc chuyên ngành gì?
Luận án "Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện" thuộc chuyên ngành Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Danh mục: Triết Học Giáo Dục.
Luận án "Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện" có bao nhiêu trang?
Luận án "Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện" có 349 trang. Bạn có thể xem trước một phần tài liệu ngay trên trang web trước khi tải về.
Cách tải luận án "Devotio Moderna: Đối đầu Văn hóa Kinh viện" về máy như thế nào?
Để tải luận án về máy, bạn nhấn nút "Tải xuống ngay" trên trang này, sau đó hoàn tất thanh toán phí lưu trữ. File sẽ được tải xuống ngay sau khi thanh toán thành công. Hỗ trợ qua Zalo: 0559 297 239.